On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Yuval Mintz wrote:
> One question I have regarding the feature, regarding the
> partial offload compatible with ndo_features_check().
>
> Consider the following example -
> Let's assume my adapter is capable of doing outer-csum validation
>
One question I have regarding the feature, regarding the
partial offload compatible with ndo_features_check().
Consider the following example -
Let's assume my adapter is capable of doing outer-csum validation
for vxlan packets, but only if inner network protocol is IPv4,
while at the same time
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Yuval Mintz wrote:
>> >> This patch assumes that the bnx2x hardware will ignore existing
>> >> IPv4/v6 header fields for length and checksum as well as the length
>> >> and checksum fields for outer UDP and GRE headers.
>> >>
>> >> I have
> >> This patch assumes that the bnx2x hardware will ignore existing
> >> IPv4/v6 header fields for length and checksum as well as the length
> >> and checksum fields for outer UDP and GRE headers.
> >>
> >> I have no means of testing this as I do not have any bnx2x hardware
> >> but thought I
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Yuval Mintz wrote:
>> This patch assumes that the bnx2x hardware will ignore existing IPv4/v6
>> header
>> fields for length and checksum as well as the length and checksum fields for
>> outer UDP and GRE headers.
>>
>> I have no means of
> This patch assumes that the bnx2x hardware will ignore existing IPv4/v6 header
> fields for length and checksum as well as the length and checksum fields for
> outer UDP and GRE headers.
>
> I have no means of testing this as I do not have any bnx2x hardware but
> thought
> I would submit it
This patch assumes that the bnx2x hardware will ignore existing IPv4/v6
header fields for length and checksum as well as the length and checksum
fields for outer UDP and GRE headers.
I have no means of testing this as I do not have any bnx2x hardware but
thought I would submit it as an RFC to see