The network device frontend driver allows the kernel to access network
devices exported exported by a virtual machine containing a physical
network device driver.
Signed-off-by: Ian Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Christian Limpach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright [EMAIL
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 00:00 -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
+
+/** Send a packet on a net device to encourage switches to learn the
+ * MAC. We send a fake ARP request.
+ *
+ * @param dev device
+ * @return 0 on success, error code otherwise
+ */
+static int send_fake_arp(struct net_device
On 18 Jul 2006, at 11:27, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Hmmm maybe it's me, but something bugs me if a NIC driver is going to
send IP level ARP packets... that just feels very very wrong and is a
blatant layering violation shouldn't the ifup/ifconfig scripts just
be fixed instead if this is
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 11:35 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
On 18 Jul 2006, at 11:27, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Hmmm maybe it's me, but something bugs me if a NIC driver is going to
send IP level ARP packets... that just feels very very wrong and is a
blatant layering violation shouldn't the
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:42:28 +0200, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 11:35 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
On 18 Jul 2006, at 11:27, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Hmmm maybe it's me, but something bugs me if a NIC driver is going to
send IP level ARP packets... that
On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 12:27 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
Hmmm maybe it's me, but something bugs me if a NIC driver is going to
send IP level ARP packets... that just feels very very wrong and is a
blatant layering violation
It is but the bonding driver has been setting precedence for
jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont think the ifup/ifconfig provide operational status (i.e link
up/down) - or do they? If they can be made to invoke scripts in such
a case then we are set.
In fact, that's a very good reason why this shouldn't be in netfront.
Indeed, it shouldn't be in the
Herbert Xu wrote:
jamal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dont think the ifup/ifconfig provide operational status (i.e link
up/down) - or do they? If they can be made to invoke scripts in such
a case then we are set.
In fact, that's a very good reason why this shouldn't be in netfront.
Indeed, it
John Haller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But sending ARPs is not the right thing if the guest is expecting
to use IPv6 networking, in which case unsolicited neighbor
advertisements are the right thing to do. The driver just
doesn't seem to be the right place to do this, as it doesn't/
shouldn't
From: Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:00:32 -0700
+#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON
+#include xen/balloon.h
+#endif
Let's put the ifdefs in xen/balloon.h not in the files
including it.
+#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON
+ /* Tell the ballon driver what is going on. */
+
* David Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
From: Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:00:32 -0700
+#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON
+#include xen/balloon.h
+#endif
Let's put the ifdefs in xen/balloon.h not in the files
including it.
+#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON
+ /*
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff -r eadc12b20f35 drivers/xen/netfront/netfront.c
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +
+++ b/drivers/xen/netfront/netfront.c Fri Jun 09 15:03:12 2006 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,1584 @@
+static inline void init_skb_shinfo(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
12 matches
Mail list logo
