On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:24 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 06:04:17AM CEST, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2017 12:01 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 5,
On 06/09/17 01:45, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 12:01 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC adds a
Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 06:04:17AM CEST, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 09/06/2017 12:01 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Cong Wang
>>> wrote:
On
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On 17-09-05 06:01 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>
>>
>> yes, like Nikolay says we have been discussing this as well. Nikolay's
>> patch is a cleaver and most importantly non-invasive
>> way today given the anchor point for tc
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:45 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 12:01 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Cong Wang
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
>>>
On 09/06/2017 12:45 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 09/06/2017 12:01 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC adds a new mode for
On 09/06/2017 12:01 AM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC adds a new mode for clsact which designates a device's egress
On 17-09-05 06:01 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
yes, like Nikolay says we have been discussing this as well. Nikolay's
patch is a cleaver and most importantly non-invasive
way today given the anchor point for tc rules is a netdev. we have
also considered a separate implicit tc anchor device.
lo
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> This RFC adds a new mode for clsact which designates a device's egress
>> classifier as global per netns. The
On 9/5/17 9:18 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
wrote:
Hi all,
This RFC adds a new mode for clsact which designates a device's egress
classifier as global per netns. The packets that are not classified for
a particular device
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:48 AM, Nikolay Aleksandrov
wrote:
> Hi all,
> This RFC adds a new mode for clsact which designates a device's egress
> classifier as global per netns. The packets that are not classified for
> a particular device will be classified using the
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 02:48:21PM CEST, niko...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>This RFC adds a new mode for clsact which designates a device's egress
>>classifier as global per netns. The packets that are not classified
Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 04:07:51PM CEST, j...@resnulli.us wrote:
>Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 02:48:21PM CEST, niko...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>This RFC adds a new mode for clsact which designates a device's egress
>>classifier as global per netns. The packets that are not classified for
>>a
Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 02:48:21PM CEST, niko...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>Hi all,
>This RFC adds a new mode for clsact which designates a device's egress
>classifier as global per netns. The packets that are not classified for
>a particular device will be classified using the global classifier.
Hi all,
This RFC adds a new mode for clsact which designates a device's egress
classifier as global per netns. The packets that are not classified for
a particular device will be classified using the global classifier.
We have needed a global classifier for some time now for various
purposes and
15 matches
Mail list logo