Re: [RFC net-next 2/3] net: dsa: Propagate VLAN add/del to CPU port(s)

2016-11-27 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 11/22/2016 08:50 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote: > Hi Florian, > > Open question: will we need to do the same for FDB and MDB objects? (overlooked that question early this week), I do expect that this could be helpful for FDB and MBD objects as well, yes. > > Florian Fainelli writes: > >> Now

Re: [RFC net-next 2/3] net: dsa: Propagate VLAN add/del to CPU port(s)

2016-11-22 Thread Vivien Didelot
Hi Florian, Open question: will we need to do the same for FDB and MDB objects? Florian Fainelli writes: > Now that the bridge layer can call into switchdev to signal programming > requests targeting the bridge master device itself, allow the switch > drivers to implement separate programming o

[RFC net-next 2/3] net: dsa: Propagate VLAN add/del to CPU port(s)

2016-11-21 Thread Florian Fainelli
Now that the bridge layer can call into switchdev to signal programming requests targeting the bridge master device itself, allow the switch drivers to implement separate programming of downstream and upstream/management ports. Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli --- n