On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:55:55AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> This is what I was suggesting by getting rid of the work queue completely.
...
> --- bridge.orig/net/bridge/br_if.c2007-02-21 10:22:46.0 -0800
> +++ bridge/net/bridge/br_if.c 2007-02-21 10:53:25.0 -0800
> @@ -7
On 02/21, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> I would rather put it in a bugfix patchset for 2.6.21 and 2.6.20-stable
OK. Even better. Could you also remove br_private.h:BR_PORT_DEBOUNCE then?
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL P
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:09:16 +0300
Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 02/21, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >
> > This is what I was suggesting by getting rid of the work queue completely.
>
> Can't comment this patch, but if we can get rid of the work_struct - good!
>
> > -static void po
On 02/21, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> This is what I was suggesting by getting rid of the work queue completely.
Can't comment this patch, but if we can get rid of the work_struct - good!
> -static void port_carrier_check(struct work_struct *work)
> +void br_port_carrier_check(struct net_bridge_
This is what I was suggesting by getting rid of the work queue completely.
---
net/bridge/br_if.c | 34 --
net/bridge/br_notify.c | 25 +++--
net/bridge/br_private.h |5 ++---
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
---
