It seems commit fda9ef5d679b07c9d9097aaf6ef7f069d794a8f9 introduced a RCU
protection for sk_filter(), without a rcu_dereference()
Either we need a rcu_dereference(), either a comment should explain why we
dont need it. I vote for the former.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems commit fda9ef5d679b07c9d9097aaf6ef7f069d794a8f9 introduced a RCU
protection for sk_filter(), without a rcu_dereference()
Either we need a rcu_dereference(), either a comment should explain why we
dont need it. I vote for the former.
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:17:06 +1100
Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems commit fda9ef5d679b07c9d9097aaf6ef7f069d794a8f9 introduced a RCU
protection for sk_filter(), without a rcu_dereference()
Either we need a rcu_dereference(), either