Please pull from 'upstream' branch of
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
to receive the tulip and iseries_veth updates described below:
drivers/net/iseries_veth.h | 46 --
drivers/net/iseries_veth.c | 869 +++---
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
to receive the following updates, including a big ipw wireless update:
include/linux/eeprom.h| 136
Documentation/networking/README.ipw2100 | 119
Documentati
Just sent this to Andrew and Linus:
Please pull from 'upstream' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
to receive the following updates:
drivers/net/sk98lin/skproc.c | 265 --
drivers/net/wan/lmc/lmc_prot.h| 15
Documentation/n
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
to receive the following updates:
Documentation/networking/bonding.txt |2
MAINTAINERS |1
drivers/net/3c503.c | 16 +--
drivers/n
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
to receive the following updates:
drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c |4
drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h |4
drivers/net/e100.c | 32 +
drivers/net/gianfar.c
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> dann frazier:
> CONFIG_AIRO needs CONFIG_CRYPTO
I think this is done wrong.
It should "select CRYPTO" rather than "depends on CRYPTO".
Otherwise people won't see it just because they don't have crypto enabled,
which is not very user-friendly.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 02:30:19PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > dann frazier:
> > CONFIG_AIRO needs CONFIG_CRYPTO
>
> I think this is done wrong.
>
> It should "select CRYPTO" rather than "depends on CRYPTO".
OK
> Otherwise people
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > dann frazier:
> > CONFIG_AIRO needs CONFIG_CRYPTO
>
> I think this is done wrong.
>
> It should "select CRYPTO" rather than "depends on CRYPTO".
>
> Otherwise people won't see it just becau
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Yes, I think that's much more Aunt-Nellie-friendly, but Roman considers it
> abuse of the Kconfig system in ways which I never completely understood?
Hmm. If Roman dislikes it, he must dislike the fact that we already do
exactly this for a ton of d
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:42:27PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 02:30:19PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > dann frazier:
> > > CONFIG_AIRO needs CONFIG_CRYPTO
> >
> > I think this is done wrong.
> >
> > I
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Yes, I think that's much more Aunt-Nellie-friendly, but Roman considers it
> > abuse of the Kconfig system in ways which I never completely understood?
>
> Hmm. If Roman dislikes it, he must dislike the fact that we already do
> exactly this fo
On Thu, Jan 12 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > dann frazier:
> > > CONFIG_AIRO needs CONFIG_CRYPTO
> >
> > I think this is done wrong.
> >
> > It should "select CRYPTO" rather than "depe
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> 'select' is really cool as a concept, but when you can't figure out why
> you cannot disable CONFIG_FOO because CONFIG_BAR selects it it's really
> annoying. Would be nice to actually be able to see if another option has
> selected th
On Fri, Jan 13 2006, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > 'select' is really cool as a concept, but when you can't figure out why
> > you cannot disable CONFIG_FOO because CONFIG_BAR selects it it's really
> > annoying. Would be nice to actually
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:28:13PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > 'select' is really cool as a concept, but when you can't figure out why
> > you cannot disable CONFIG_FOO because CONFIG_BAR selects it it's really
> > annoying. Woul
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:29:49 +0100 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:28:13PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >
> > > 'select' is really cool as a concept, but when you can't figure out why
> > > you cannot disable CONFIG
16 matches
Mail list logo
