A struct with only a single field does not make much sense. Besides
that, it was used by print_summary() only.

Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc>
---
 misc/ss.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/misc/ss.c b/misc/ss.c
index ec71c21ce6a4a..c7818eadf9e75 100644
--- a/misc/ss.c
+++ b/misc/ss.c
@@ -3661,10 +3661,6 @@ static int handle_follow_request(struct filter *f)
        return ret;
 }
 
-struct snmpstat {
-       int tcp_estab;
-};
-
 static int get_snmp_int(char *proto, char *key, int *result)
 {
        char buf[1024];
@@ -3785,11 +3781,11 @@ static int get_sockstat(struct ssummary *s)
 static int print_summary(void)
 {
        struct ssummary s;
-       struct snmpstat sn;
+       int tcp_estab;
 
        if (get_sockstat(&s) < 0)
                perror("ss: get_sockstat");
-       if (get_snmp_int("Tcp:", "CurrEstab", &sn.tcp_estab) < 0)
+       if (get_snmp_int("Tcp:", "CurrEstab", &tcp_estab) < 0)
                perror("ss: get_snmpstat");
 
        get_slabstat(&slabstat);
@@ -3798,7 +3794,7 @@ static int print_summary(void)
 
        printf("TCP:   %d (estab %d, closed %d, orphaned %d, synrecv %d, 
timewait %d/%d), ports %d\n",
               s.tcp_total + slabstat.tcp_syns + s.tcp_tws,
-              sn.tcp_estab,
+              tcp_estab,
               s.tcp_total - (s.tcp4_hashed+s.tcp6_hashed-s.tcp_tws),
               s.tcp_orphans,
               slabstat.tcp_syns,
-- 
2.10.0

Reply via email to