By combining the attribute extraction and check for existence, the
additional indentation level in the 'else' clause can be avoided.
In addition to that, common actions for 'daddr' are combined since the
function returns if neither of the branches are taken.
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter
---
ip/tc
From: Of Phil Sutter
> Sent: 21 June 2016 17:19
> By combining the attribute extraction and check for existence, the
> additional indentation level in the 'else' clause can be avoided.
>
> In addition to that, common actions for 'daddr' are combined since the
> function returns if neither of the b
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:53:43AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:18:41 +0200
> Phil Sutter wrote:
>
> > By combining the attribute extraction and check for existence, the
> > additional indentation level in the 'else' clause can be avoided.
> >
> > In addition to that,
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:18:41 +0200
Phil Sutter wrote:
> By combining the attribute extraction and check for existence, the
> additional indentation level in the 'else' clause can be avoided.
>
> In addition to that, common actions for 'daddr' are combined since the
> function returns if neither
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:18 PM CEST, Phil Sutter wrote:
> By combining the attribute extraction and check for existence, the
> additional indentation level in the 'else' clause can be avoided.
>
> In addition to that, common actions for 'daddr' are combined since the
> function returns if neithe
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:34:13PM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 06:18 PM CEST, Phil Sutter wrote:
[...]
> > - a = attrs[TCP_METRICS_ATTR_ADDR_IPV4];
> > - if (a) {
> > + if ((a = attrs[TCP_METRICS_ATTR_ADDR_IPV4])) {
>
> Copy the pointer inside the branch?
>
> Sam
From: Jakub Sitnicki
> Sent: 22 June 2016 12:34
...
> > - a = attrs[TCP_METRICS_ATTR_ADDR_IPV4];
> > - if (a) {
> > + if ((a = attrs[TCP_METRICS_ATTR_ADDR_IPV4])) {
>
> Copy the pointer inside the branch?
>
> Same gain on indentation while keeping checkpatch happy.
Or as below (hacked from
Hi David,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:00:08PM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Jakub Sitnicki
> > Sent: 22 June 2016 12:34
> ...
> > > - a = attrs[TCP_METRICS_ATTR_ADDR_IPV4];
> > > - if (a) {
> > > + if ((a = attrs[TCP_METRICS_ATTR_ADDR_IPV4])) {
> >
> > Copy the pointer inside the branch?
> >
