From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>

Replace the %d specifier used for printing vsi->active_filters and
vsi->promisc_threshold with an unsigned %u format specifier. While it is
unlikely in practice that these values will ever reach such a large
number they are unsigned values and thus should not be interpreted as
negative numbers.

Change-ID: Iff050fad5a1c8537c4c57fcd527441cd95cfc0d4
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bow...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c
index b8a03a0..f1f41f1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_debugfs.c
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static void i40e_dbg_dump_vsi_seid(struct i40e_pf *pf, int 
seid)
                         f->macaddr, f->vlan,
                         i40e_filter_state_string[f->state]);
        }
-       dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "    active_filters %d, promisc_threshold %d, 
overflow promisc %s\n",
+       dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "    active_filters %u, promisc_threshold %u, 
overflow promisc %s\n",
                 vsi->active_filters, vsi->promisc_threshold,
                 (test_bit(__I40E_FILTER_OVERFLOW_PROMISC, &vsi->state) ?
                  "ON" : "OFF"));
-- 
2.9.3

Reply via email to