From: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidm...@intel.com> In ixgbevf_reset_subtask We weren't verifying that the port haven't been removed, we are with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidm...@intel.com> Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bow...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c index 7dc4245..201e482 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c @@ -2774,6 +2774,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_reset_subtask(struct ixgbevf_adapter *adapter) /* If we're already down or resetting, just bail */ if (test_bit(__IXGBEVF_DOWN, &adapter->state) || + test_bit(__IXGBEVF_REMOVING, &adapter->state) || test_bit(__IXGBEVF_RESETTING, &adapter->state)) return; -- 2.5.5