On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:35 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:19:28 -0800
>
>> I was wondering what your thoughts would be about widening the size of
>> the length field that we pass into csum_tcpudp_magic from a 16 bit to
>> a 24 or 32 bit value? The gen
From: Alexander Duyck
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:19:28 -0800
> I was wondering what your thoughts would be about widening the size of
> the length field that we pass into csum_tcpudp_magic from a 16 bit to
> a 24 or 32 bit value? The general idea would be to shift tunnels over
> to uniformly using
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:09 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:10:59 -0800
>
>> This change makes it so that we only use a 16 bit length field instead of a
>> 32 bit length field when computing a UDP checksum for IPv6.
>>
>> This fixes an issue found with
From: Alexander Duyck
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 19:10:59 -0800
> This change makes it so that we only use a 16 bit length field instead of a
> 32 bit length field when computing a UDP checksum for IPv6.
>
> This fixes an issue found with UDP tunnels over IPv6 where the total size
> exceeded 65536 f
This change makes it so that we only use a 16 bit length field instead of a
32 bit length field when computing a UDP checksum for IPv6.
This fixes an issue found with UDP tunnels over IPv6 where the total size
exceeded 65536 for a frame that was to be segmented. As a result the
checksum being com
