Re: [net-next PATCH RFC 04/26] arch/arm: Add option to skip sync on DMA map and unmap

2016-10-31 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:04:47AM -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> The use of DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC was not consistent across all of the DMA >> APIs in the arch/arm folder. This change is meant to correct

Re: [net-next PATCH RFC 04/26] arch/arm: Add option to skip sync on DMA map and unmap

2016-10-31 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:04:47AM -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote: > The use of DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC was not consistent across all of the DMA > APIs in the arch/arm folder. This change is meant to correct that so that > we get consistent behavior. I'm really not convinced that this is anywhere

[net-next PATCH RFC 04/26] arch/arm: Add option to skip sync on DMA map and unmap

2016-10-24 Thread Alexander Duyck
The use of DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC was not consistent across all of the DMA APIs in the arch/arm folder. This change is meant to correct that so that we get consistent behavior. Cc: Russell King Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck ---