On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 14:36 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
>
> Instead of defining two versions of skb_mark_napi_id I think it is more
> readable to just match the format of the sk_mark_napi_id functions and just
> wrap the contents of the function instead of defining two v
From: Alexander Duyck
Instead of defining two versions of skb_mark_napi_id I think it is more
readable to just match the format of the sk_mark_napi_id functions and just
wrap the contents of the function instead of defining two versions of the
function. This way we can save a few lines of code s