From: Alexander Duyck
>From what I can tell there is only a couple spots where we are actually
checking the return value of sk_busy_loop. As there are only a few
consumers of that data, and the data being checked for can be replaced
with a check for !skb_queue_empty() we might as well just pull t
On Thu, 2017-03-23 at 14:37 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck
>
> >From what I can tell there is only a couple spots where we are actually
> checking the return value of sk_busy_loop. As there are only a few
> consumers of that data, and the data being checked for can be repla
