Re: [net-next RFC 0/4] SO_BINDTOPREFIX

2016-03-29 Thread Eric Dumazet
On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 02:26 +, Gilberto Bertin wrote: > Since the net-next window just opened, I'm resubmitting my RFC for the > SO_BINDTOSUBNET patch, following Mark Smith's suggestion to rename the > whole thing to a more clear SO_BINDTOPREFIX. Please do not add such monolithic option. BPF

[net-next RFC 0/4] SO_BINDTOPREFIX

2016-03-29 Thread Gilberto Bertin
Since the net-next window just opened, I'm resubmitting my RFC for the SO_BINDTOSUBNET patch, following Mark Smith's suggestion to rename the whole thing to a more clear SO_BINDTOPREFIX. Some arguments for and against it since the first submission: * SO_BINDTOPREFIX is an arbitrary option and can