On 12/22/2017 12:24 AM, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
On 2017/12/20 8:00, Shannon Nelson wrote:
If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then
set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're
here, we fix an oddly named field in the context descriptor struct.
[...]
On 2017/12/20 8:00, Shannon Nelson wrote:
If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then
set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're
here, we fix an oddly named field in the context descriptor struct.
v3: added ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD check around
If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then
set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're
here, we fix an oddly named field in the context descriptor struct.
v3: added ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD check around call to ixgbe_ipsec_tx()
v2: use ihl != 5
Hi Shannon,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.15-rc3]
[also build test ERROR on next-20171215]
[cannot apply to jkirsher-next-queue/dev-queue]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On 12/15/2017 12:10 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
[...]
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c: In function
'ixgbe_xmit_frame_ring':
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c:8563:11: error: 'struct sk_buff'
has no member named 'sp'; did you mean 'sk'?
if (skb->sp &&
Hi Shannon,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.15-rc3]
[also build test ERROR on next-20171215]
[cannot apply to jkirsher-next-queue/dev-queue]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 21:45:13 -0800
Shannon Nelson wrote:
> > Also you are still setting the TCP flag for these packets. I'm
> > wondering if the TCP flag is really needed. I get that your current
> > setup only runs on TCP flows but what about other types of flows?
> >
On 12/12/2017 5:59 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Shannon Nelson
wrote:
If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then
set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're
here, we fix an oddly named field
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Shannon Nelson
wrote:
> If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then
> set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're
> here, we fix an oddly named field in the context descriptor struct.
>
>
If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then
set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're
here, we fix an oddly named field in the context descriptor struct.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson
---
v2: use ihl != 5
move the
On 12/7/2017 9:56 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
You've suggested several things here, all good things to look into,
which I will do, most now, some in the near future.
Thanks!
sln
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Shannon Nelson
wrote:
On 12/5/2017 10:13 AM,
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Shannon Nelson
wrote:
> On 12/5/2017 10:13 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Shannon Nelson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then
>>>
On 12/5/2017 10:13 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Shannon Nelson
wrote:
If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then
set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're
here, we fix an oddly named field
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Shannon Nelson
wrote:
> If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then
> set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're
> here, we fix an oddly named field in the context descriptor struct.
>
>
If the skb has a security association referenced in the skb, then
set up the Tx descriptor with the ipsec offload bits. While we're
here, we fix an oddly named field in the context descriptor struct.
Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson
---
15 matches
Mail list logo