On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:43:39PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
I just wanted to warn that some of the changes are already in akpm
's tree (-mm).
Becuase off hand I've forgotten which ones, would it be better to
diff against -mm instead?
tulip-fix-shutdown-dma-irq-race.patch
tulip: fix
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:56:07 -0400
Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:43:39PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
I just wanted to warn that some of the changes are already in akpm
's tree (-mm).
Becuase off hand I've forgotten which ones, would it be better to
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:35:32AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
hm. A couple of those patches have been futzing around in -mm for over a
year and have been nacked by Jeff and are a regular source of grumpygrams.
I've been sitting on them in the pathetic hope that someone will one day
get down
Andrew Morton wrote:
hm. A couple of those patches have been futzing around in -mm for over a
year and have been nacked by Jeff and are a regular source of grumpygrams.
I've been sitting on them in the pathetic hope that someone will one day
get down and address the bugs which they fix in an
Kyle McMartin wrote:
parisc-linux
merged Francois' tulip workqueue patch some time ago, and have been
running with it since without issue. This defers the tulip_select_media
work to process context, and so should be less of an issue.
Good to hear. That's definitely my preference for future
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 06:54:59PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
Hi Val,
Sorry it took so long for me to get around to splitting
up the changes from the parisc-linux tree. But here
they finally are.
Kyle,
dude, you rock!
Many thanks for doing that.
I just wanted to warn that some of the
