On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:20:22PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
Hmm, I'm still confused...
Dan
Don't worry, you are not the only one being confused...
Anyway, I made some decisions, for a change ;-) Wireless
Extensions 21 will be the big switch over when ESSID length are the
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 14:18 -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:06:33PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:28:43PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:28:44PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
I'll post a revert patch for the
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:33:00AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
Jean,
You mean it would be wise to _not_ commit this patch, right?
Yeah, it depend which way you look at it. I was talking of the
reverse patch ;-)
John: if that's the case (and I think it is?), please back that patch
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 09:07 -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:33:00AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
Jean,
You mean it would be wise to _not_ commit this patch, right?
Yeah, it depend which way you look at it. I was talking of the
reverse patch ;-)
John:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:06:33PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:28:43PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:28:44PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
I'll post a revert patch for the patch I originally sent so that we go
back to the original
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:28:43PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:28:44PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
I'll post a revert patch for the patch I originally sent so that we go
back to the original behavior.
Sorry, I may have overreacted. I think that's a
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:01:44PM -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
ESSIDs can technically include NULL characters. Drivers should not be
adjusting the length of the ESSID before reporting it in their
SIOCGIWESSID handlers. Breaks
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 10:13 -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:01:44PM -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
ESSIDs can technically include NULL characters. Drivers should not be
adjusting the length of the
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:28:44PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
I'll post a revert patch for the patch I originally sent so that we go
back to the original behavior.
Sorry, I may have overreacted. I think that's a worthwhile
change, let's just plan it properly.
Dan
Jean
-
To
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 10:13:16AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 05:01:44PM -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
It is spelled very clearly on my web site :
---
# The HostAP driver is the reference implementation
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 17:01 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
ESSIDs can technically include NULL characters. Drivers should not be
adjusting the length of the ESSID before reporting it in their
SIOCGIWESSID handlers. Breaks stuff
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 11:07:10AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 17:01 -0800, Jouni Malinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
1) The patch preserves the null-termination of the ESSID, it just
doesn't return the expanded length to
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:00:58PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
ESSIDs can technically include NULL characters. Drivers should not be
adjusting the length of the ESSID before reporting it in their
SIOCGIWESSID handlers. Breaks stuff like wpa_supplicant. Note that ipw
drivers, which seem to
Hi,
ESSIDs can technically include NULL characters. Drivers should not be
adjusting the length of the ESSID before reporting it in their
SIOCGIWESSID handlers. Breaks stuff like wpa_supplicant. Note that ipw
drivers, which seem to currently be the most correct, don't have this
problem.
14 matches
Mail list logo
