From: lyw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:16:36 +0800
> Mr David:
>
>I have submitted a patch to fix the ndisc_send_resirect(), and this
> patch has been agreed by Mr yoshifuji. But you have not applied yet.
> The following is Mr yoshifuji's reply, and I submitted the patch agai
Mr David:
I have submitted a patch to fix the ndisc_send_resirect(), and this
patch has been agreed by Mr yoshifuji. But you have not applied yet.
The following is Mr yoshifuji's reply, and I submitted the patch again.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 13
Jan 2007 17:12:40 +0800), Li Ye
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 says:
It is not mandatory, however, it is better to do this. I agree.
(Note: In usual, we do not install gateway'ed route with global
next-hop.)
Yes, but if somebody set the route with global next-hop, or some
other reasons, the next-hop with global address. The
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:12:40 +0800), Li Yewang
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> When I tested IPv6 redirect function about kernel 2.6.19.1, and found
> that the kernel can send redirect packets whose target address is global
> address, and the target is not the actual
Hi All
When I tested IPv6 redirect function about kernel 2.6.19.1, and found
that the kernel can send redirect packets whose target address is global
address, and the target is not the actual endpoint of communication.
But the criteria conform to RFC2461, the target address defines as
followin
