From: Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:09:37 +1000
> secondly, this is a bit rude, isn't it, destroying the whole thing
> because one insertion failed? Some existing pppd will come along and
> try to use its (previously successfully created) ppp unit and get told
> it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> From: Panagiotis Issaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The PPP code contains two kmalloc()s followed by memset()s without handling a
> possible memory allocation failure. (Suggested by Joe Perches).
Nack, because...
> - cardmap_set(&all_ppp_units, unit, ppp);
> +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:03:38 -0700
> From: Panagiotis Issaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The PPP code contains two kmalloc()s followed by memset()s without handling a
> possible memory allocation failure. (Suggested by Joe Perches).
>
> And furthermore, conversions from
From: Panagiotis Issaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The PPP code contains two kmalloc()s followed by memset()s without handling a
possible memory allocation failure. (Suggested by Joe Perches).
And furthermore, conversions from kmalloc+memset to kzalloc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: fix error-path leak]
[EMAIL
