From: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:59:09 +0530 (IST)
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
> > 2) The reiserfs definition is going to define an equivalent
> >value, so just adding an #undef and still letting reiserfs
> >override is wrong. Why put a c
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote:
> [...]
> > 1) The reiserfs definition is better, it is _type_ based.
> >Please use (~(__u16)0) and (~(__u32)0), respectively.
>
> Hmm, in that case ((__u16)0x) and ((__u32)0x)
Hi David,
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:12:10 -0700
>
> > From: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ... in kernel.h and clean up home-grown macros elsewhere in the tree.
> >
> > Leave out the one in reiserfs_fs.h as it is
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:12:10 -0700
>
> > From: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > ... in kernel.h and clean up home-grown macros elsewhere in the tree.
> >
> > Leave out the on
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:12:10 -0700
> From: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ... in kernel.h and clean up home-grown macros elsewhere in the tree.
>
> Leave out the one in reiserfs_fs.h as it is in the userspace-visible part
> of that header. Still, #undef the (equ
From: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
... in kernel.h and clean up home-grown macros elsewhere in the tree.
Leave out the one in reiserfs_fs.h as it is in the userspace-visible part
of that header. Still, #undef the (equivalent) kernel version there to
avoid seeing "redefined, previous definiti
