Re: [pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

2018-04-24 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 05:22:27PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> > For example, I'm not sure what you mean by "devices where the PF is >> > not capable of managing VF resources."

Re: [pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

2018-04-24 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 05:22:27PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > For example, I'm not sure what you mean by "devices where the PF is > > not capable of managing VF resources." > > > > It *sounds* like you're saying the hardware works dif

Re: [pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

2018-04-23 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 8:21 AM, Don Dutile wrote: > On 04/21/2018 04:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:28:08PM -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote: >>> >>> This series is meant to add support for SR-IOV on devices when the VFs >>> are >>> not managed by the kernel. Examples of

Re: [pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

2018-04-23 Thread Don Dutile
On 04/21/2018 04:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:28:08PM -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote: This series is meant to add support for SR-IOV on devices when the VFs are not managed by the kernel. Examples of recent patches attempting to do this include: virto - https://patchwork.

Re: [pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

2018-04-21 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:28:08PM -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> This series is meant to add support for SR-IOV on devices when the VFs are >> not managed by the kernel. Examples of recent patches attempting to do this >> include: >> virto

Re: [pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

2018-04-21 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:28:08PM -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote: > This series is meant to add support for SR-IOV on devices when the VFs are > not managed by the kernel. Examples of recent patches attempting to do this > include: > virto - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10241225/ > pci-stub -

Re: [pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

2018-04-20 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/20/18 13:01, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> On 04/20/18 09:28, Alexander Duyck wrote: >>> This series is meant to add support for SR-IOV on devices when the VFs are >>> not managed by the kernel. Examples of recent patches attempting to do t

Re: [pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

2018-04-20 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:23 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/20/18 09:28, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> This series is meant to add support for SR-IOV on devices when the VFs are >> not managed by the kernel. Examples of recent patches attempting to do this >> include: >> virto - https://patchwork.ke

Re: [pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

2018-04-20 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 04/20/18 09:28, Alexander Duyck wrote: > This series is meant to add support for SR-IOV on devices when the VFs are > not managed by the kernel. Examples of recent patches attempting to do this > include: > virto - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10241225/ > pci-stub - https://patchwork.kerne

[pci PATCH v8 0/4] Add support for unmanaged SR-IOV

2018-04-20 Thread Alexander Duyck
This series is meant to add support for SR-IOV on devices when the VFs are not managed by the kernel. Examples of recent patches attempting to do this include: virto - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10241225/ pci-stub - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10109935/ vfio - https://patchwork.kerne