Re: 2.6.17-mm3

2006-07-09 Thread Herbert Xu
Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was moved, sorry. I fail to spot any relevant backtraces for skge or indeed any part of the networking stack. Ingo/Arjan, perhaps you guys can figure out what's wrong here. In future perhaps you should consider posting the dmesg to the list

Re: 2.6.17-mm3

2006-07-08 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Stephen Hemminger napisał(a): On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:12:42 +0200 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 27/06/06, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17/2.6.17-mm3/ It looks like a skge bug

Re: 2.6.17-mm3

2006-07-07 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:12:42 +0200 Michal Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 27/06/06, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17/2.6.17-mm3/ It looks like a skge bug

Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} - {in-softirq-R} usage.

2006-06-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:01:06 -0700 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ BUG: illegal lock usage! ] This is claiming that we're taking sk-sk_dst_lock in a deadlockable manner. illegal {softirq-on-W} - {in-softirq-R} usage. It found someone doing

Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} - {in-softirq-R} usage.

2006-06-29 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:01:06 -0700 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ BUG: illegal lock usage! ] This is claiming that we're taking sk-sk_dst_lock in a deadlockable manner. illegal {softirq-on-W}

Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} - {in-softirq-R} usage.

2006-06-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:42:34 +0200 Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:01:06 -0700 Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ BUG: illegal lock usage! ] This is claiming

Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- BUG: illegal lock usage -- illegal {softirq-on-W} - {in-softirq-R} usage.

2006-06-29 Thread Herbert Xu
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: inet_bind() -sk_dst_get -read_lock(sk-sk_dst_lock) We are still holding the sock lock when doing sk_dst_get. 1 lock held by java_vm/4418: #0: (af_family_keys + (sk)-sk_family#4){-+..}, at: [f93c9281] tcp_v6_rcv+0x308/0x7b7

Re: 2.6.17-mm3 -- NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000020 / EIP is at prism2_registers_proc_read+0x22/0x2ff [hostap_cs]

2006-06-28 Thread Andrew Morton
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0020 printing eip: f8d21f6e *pde = Oops: [#1] 4K_STACKS PREEMPT last sysfs file: /devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_setspeed Modules linked in: sg sd_mod