On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:01:06 -0700
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ BUG: illegal lock usage! ]
This is claiming that we're taking sk-sk_dst_lock in a deadlockable manner.
illegal {softirq-on-W} - {in-softirq-R} usage.
It found someone doing
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:01:06 -0700
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ BUG: illegal lock usage! ]
This is claiming that we're taking sk-sk_dst_lock in a deadlockable manner.
illegal {softirq-on-W}
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:42:34 +0200
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 12:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:01:06 -0700
Miles Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ BUG: illegal lock usage! ]
This is claiming
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
inet_bind()
-sk_dst_get
-read_lock(sk-sk_dst_lock)
We are still holding the sock lock when doing sk_dst_get.
1 lock held by java_vm/4418:
#0: (af_family_keys + (sk)-sk_family#4){-+..}, at: [f93c9281]
tcp_v6_rcv+0x308/0x7b7
