AW: Does tc-prio really work as advertised?

2007-11-27 Thread Joerg Pommnitz
> So, are you still sure you've tested such a case? Well, the problem that triggered my investigation was that the OLSR daemon (www.olsr.org) calculates the quality of a link according to the packet loss for LQ HELLO packets (UDP broadcast packets). To prevent other traffic from interfering with t

Re: AW: Does tc-prio really work as advertised?

2007-11-27 Thread Patrick McHardy
Joerg Pommnitz wrote: > It works fine here, I'm guessing that Jörg is using an old kernel > version that had a bug in prio classification without filters. This is 2.6.20.21, from 17-Oct-2007. Yes, that version is broken. I think it was fixed in 2.6.22 or 2.6.23. - To unsubscribe from this

AW: Does tc-prio really work as advertised?

2007-11-27 Thread Joerg Pommnitz
> It works fine here, I'm guessing that Jörg is using an old kernel > version that had a bug in prio classification without filters. This is 2.6.20.21, from 17-Oct-2007. -- Regards Joerg __ Ihre erste Baustelle? Wissenswertes für Bastler

AW: Does tc-prio really work as advertised?

2007-11-27 Thread Joerg Pommnitz
Jarek, this is all about outgoing packets, e.g. egress to use your word. It doesn't matter whether the packets are originated locally or whether the packets are forwarded from another host (I tried both). To restate the problem: according to my observations the prio qdisc (and probably pfifo_fast,