IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
David
From: David Ahern
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
Last time I tried to do that someone immediately said on the list
"Don't, we're using that!"
On 11/24/18 6:25 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern
> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
>
>> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
>> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>
> Last time I tried to do that someone imm
David Miller writes:
> From: David Ahern
> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
>
>> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
>> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>
> Last time I tried to do that someone immediately said on the
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 4:14 AM David Ahern wrote:
>
> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>
> David
Kill it :)
From: Bjørn Mork
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 12:30:26 +0100
> David Miller writes:
>> From: David Ahern
>> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
>>
>>> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
>>> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>
On Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:12:48 -0700
David Ahern wrote:
> IPX was moved to staging at the end of last year. Can decnet follow
> suit? git log seems to indicate no active development in a very long time.
>
> David
I have no problem with dropping decnet support from iproute first.
Presumably anyone
