Re: Code quality and XDP

2016-10-09 Thread David Miller
From: Tom Herbert Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 12:11:51 -0700 > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer > wrote: >> >> On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 07:25:01 +0900 Tom Herbert wrote: >> >>> One concern raised at netdev concerning XDP is how are we going to >>> maintain code quality, security, and

Re: Code quality and XDP

2016-10-08 Thread Tom Herbert
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 07:25:01 +0900 Tom Herbert wrote: > >> One concern raised at netdev concerning XDP is how are we going to >> maintain code quality, security, and correctness of programs being >> loaded. With kernel bypass it is

Re: Code quality and XDP

2016-10-07 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 07:25:01 +0900 Tom Herbert wrote: > One concern raised at netdev concerning XDP is how are we going to > maintain code quality, security, and correctness of programs being > loaded. With kernel bypass it is not just the kernel code path that is > being bypassed, but also the p

Code quality and XDP

2016-10-07 Thread Tom Herbert
One concern raised at netdev concerning XDP is how are we going to maintain code quality, security, and correctness of programs being loaded. With kernel bypass it is not just the kernel code path that is being bypassed, but also the processes that hold the quality of code being accepted to a high