From: Tom Herbert
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 12:11:51 -0700
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 07:25:01 +0900 Tom Herbert wrote:
>>
>>> One concern raised at netdev concerning XDP is how are we going to
>>> maintain code quality, security, and
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 07:25:01 +0900 Tom Herbert wrote:
>
>> One concern raised at netdev concerning XDP is how are we going to
>> maintain code quality, security, and correctness of programs being
>> loaded. With kernel bypass it is
On Sat, 8 Oct 2016 07:25:01 +0900 Tom Herbert wrote:
> One concern raised at netdev concerning XDP is how are we going to
> maintain code quality, security, and correctness of programs being
> loaded. With kernel bypass it is not just the kernel code path that is
> being bypassed, but also the p
One concern raised at netdev concerning XDP is how are we going to
maintain code quality, security, and correctness of programs being
loaded. With kernel bypass it is not just the kernel code path that is
being bypassed, but also the processes that hold the quality of code
being accepted to a high