On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 12:44:31PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> The idea is quite different. It has nothing to do with Edward's
> proposal[3]. The RX packet-vector is simply an array, either of pointers
> or index numbers (into the RX-ring). The needed changes are completely
> conta
On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 19:12:44 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >
> > Let me try in a calm way (not like [1]) to explain how I imagine that
> > the XDP processing RX-stage should be implemented. As I've pointed out
> > be
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> Let me try in a calm way (not like [1]) to explain how I imagine that
> the XDP processing RX-stage should be implemented. As I've pointed out
> before[2], I'm proposing splitting up the driver into RX-stages. This
> is a
Let me try in a calm way (not like [1]) to explain how I imagine that
the XDP processing RX-stage should be implemented. As I've pointed out
before[2], I'm proposing splitting up the driver into RX-stages. This
is a mental-model change, I hope you can follow my "inception" attempt.
The basic con
