On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Martin Habets wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 17/01/17 22:05, Tom Herbert wrote:
>> There was some discussion about the problems of dealing with the
>> explosion of NIC features in the mlx directory restructuring proposal,
>> but I think the is a deeper issue here that sho
Hi Tom,
On 17/01/17 22:05, Tom Herbert wrote:
> There was some discussion about the problems of dealing with the
> explosion of NIC features in the mlx directory restructuring proposal,
> but I think the is a deeper issue here that should be discussed.
>
> It's hard not to notice that there has b
On 01/17/2017 02:05 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> I realize that backports of a driver is not a specific concern of the
> Linux kernel, but nevertheless this is a real problem and a fact of
> life for many users. Rebasing the full kernel is still a major effort
> and it seems the best we could ever do i
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> There was some discussion about the problems of dealing with the
> explosion of NIC features in the mlx directory restructuring proposal,
> but I think the is a deeper issue here that should be discussed.
>
> It's hard not to notice that there
There was some discussion about the problems of dealing with the
explosion of NIC features in the mlx directory restructuring proposal,
but I think the is a deeper issue here that should be discussed.
It's hard not to notice that there has been quite a proliferation of
NIC features in several driv
