Hi jamal and denys,
> > One message later, thats what i dreamed about :-)
> > Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] NET_SCHED: PSPacer qdisc module
> > On website they have very good explanation...
> > http://www.gridmpi.org/gridtcp.jsp
>
> That looks interesting - without reading the papers a few questions a
On Wed, 2007-21-11 at 12:31 +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:47:10 +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote
> >
> > But, if you have full control on your side, it looks like a kind of
> > realtime traffic, and then HFSC should be more appropriate for this
> > (but I only 'heard' abo
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:47:10 +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote
>
> But, if you have full control on your side, it looks like a kind of
> realtime traffic, and then HFSC should be more appropriate for this
> (but I only 'heard' about this).
One message later, thats what i dreamed about :-)
Subject: [RF
On 20-11-2007 22:21, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
...
> If traffic is dropped - it will be resent, a lot of energy will be wasted for
> nothing. Same bytes will pass all long way around earth just because i am not
> able to manage my QoS box :-)
Sure, but you'll use probably almost every bit you'
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:00:56 +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote
> Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote, On 11/20/2007 10:43 AM:
>
>
> > If let's say i will limit bandwidth to 1Mbps, and will try to send
packets
> > will 100Mbps speed, and will check which packets will be dropped.
>
> As a matter of fact,
Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote, On 11/20/2007 10:43 AM:
...
> If let's say i will limit bandwidth to 1Mbps, and will try to send packets
> will 100Mbps speed, and will check which packets will be dropped.
As a matter of fact, I wonder why you're so afraid of this dropping. It's
usual method of auto
I wish i can setup soon my own lab (getting finally my personal room in
company).
About CBQ, i didn't use it since long time. There is anything good in it?
What is interesting i did few tests with iperf as example, and what i found
out:
iperf running 60 seconds with 1Mbit bandwidth set (iperf -
Denys,
You certainly make a very compelling case. It is always compelling if
you can translate a bug/feature into $$;->.
So in your measurements, what kind of clock sources did you use?
I think the parameters to worry about are: packet size, rate and clock
source.
I know that based on very old m
Hi 2 all again
This is not a bug report this time :-)
Just it is very interesting question, about using Linux "shaping" technologies
in serious jobs.
What i realised few days ago, many ISP's set on their STM-1(15552 bits/s)
links (over Cisco) packet buffer/queue 40 packets(for example).
It m
