On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 11:47 -0500, jamal wrote:
> Your scheme for least square fit for evaluating the hash results
> seems to be mostly fine for worst case lookups (I havent found a spot
> where it lied about this at least). The only problem is it doesnt take
> into consideration the spread as well
Russell,
Your scheme for least square fit for evaluating the hash results
seems to be mostly fine for worst case lookups (I havent found a spot
where it lied about this at least). The only problem is it doesnt take
into consideration the spread as well and thus the memory utilization
aspect. So if
