> Do you find information from a Linux allocation failure report sufficient
> for such an use case?
yes, I suppose that would cover the needed cases.
Your change looks good to me.
Acked-by: Sowmini Varadhan
>> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
>
> The change itself is harmless, but I'm curious about the "extra"
> part: "extra" from what? If this happens, hopefully this will be logged
> somewhere? Note that this type of (infrequent) logging noise is useful
> in s
On (05/22/17 16:13), SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
The change itself is harmless, but I'm curious about the "extra"
part: "extra" from what? If this happens, hopefully this will be logged
somewhere? Note that this type of (in
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 15:45:31 +0200
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Link:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/LCJ16-Refactor_Strings-WSang_0.pdf
Sign
