Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

2015-10-09 Thread Kamezawa Hiroyuki
On 2015/10/09 14:52, Jiang Liu wrote: On 2015/10/9 4:20, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: Acked-by: Kiran Patil Where's the call to preempt_disable()

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

2015-10-09 Thread Jiang Liu
On 2015/10/9 17:08, Kamezawa Hiroyuki wrote: > On 2015/10/09 14:52, Jiang Liu wrote: >> On 2015/10/9 4:20, Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes >>> wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: > Acked-by: Kiran

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

2015-10-08 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: > > > Acked-by: Kiran Patil > > Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with preemption > from making numa_node_id() invalid

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

2015-10-08 Thread Jiang Liu
On 2015/10/9 4:20, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes > wrote: > >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: >> >>> Acked-by: Kiran Patil >> >> Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

2015-08-19 Thread Patil, Kiran
Acked-by: Kiran Patil kiran.pa...@intel.com -Original Message- From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On Behalf Of Jiang Liu Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 8:19 PM To: Andrew Morton; Mel Gorman; David Rientjes; Mike Galbraith; Peter Zijlstra; Wysocki,

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to better support memoryless node

2015-08-19 Thread David Rientjes
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote: Acked-by: Kiran Patil kiran.pa...@intel.com Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with preemption from making numa_node_id() invalid during this iteration? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in the body