On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > You should however consider writing a DSA driver for the switch.
>>
>> Do you mean SWITCHDEV or is this more or less the same? From time to
>> time I'm looking at DSA/switchdev patches in the mailing list, but
>> there seems to be not so man
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:14:17AM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:23:59PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 0
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> After changing cpsw_emac0 entry to:
>>
>> &cpsw_emac0 {
>> phy-mode = "rmii";
>> dual_emac_res_vlan = <1>;
>> fixed-link {
>> speed = <100>;
>> full-duplex;
>> };
>> };
>>
>> I've
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:23:59PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 04:59:23PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> >
> >> This patch breaks my am335x based board, where one of the CPSW slaves
> >> is connected
> > You should however consider writing a DSA driver for the switch.
>
> Do you mean SWITCHDEV or is this more or less the same? From time to
> time I'm looking at DSA/switchdev patches in the mailing list, but
> there seems to be not so many example in kernel. What are the latest
> slides, papers
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:23 AM, wrote:
> From: Shaohui Xie
>
> Currently, if phy state is PHY_RUNNING, we always register a CHANGE
> when phy works in polling or interrupt ignored, this will make the
> adjust_link being called even the phy link did Not changed.
>
> checking the phy link to make
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:23:59PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 04:59:23PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>> >
>> >> This patch breaks my am335
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 04:59:23PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>
>> This patch breaks my am335x based board, where one of the CPSW slaves
>> is connected to IP175D switch chip via RMII interface. Since this
>> patch packet receptio
> After changing cpsw_emac0 entry to:
>
> &cpsw_emac0 {
> phy-mode = "rmii";
> dual_emac_res_vlan = <1>;
> fixed-link {
> speed = <100>;
> full-duplex;
> };
> };
>
> I've got packets running in both directions.
Great.
> Now I have
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 04:59:23PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> This patch breaks my am335x based board, where one of the CPSW slaves
> is connected to IP175D switch chip via RMII interface. Since this
> patch packet reception is not working.
Hi Yegor
Which phy is causing the problem? A PHY i
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:14:17AM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:23:59PM +0100, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
>> >> Hi Andrew,
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5
Le 08/13/15 21:23, shh@gmail.com a écrit :
> From: Shaohui Xie
>
> Currently, if phy state is PHY_RUNNING, we always register a CHANGE
> when phy works in polling or interrupt ignored, this will make the
> adjust_link being called even the phy link did Not changed.
Right, which is why most d
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Fainelli [mailto:f.faine...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2015 1:02 AM
> To: shh@gmail.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net
> Cc: Xie Shaohui-B21989
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY_RUNNING in phy_sta
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Fainelli [mailto:f.faine...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 15, 2015 1:02 AM
> To: shh@gmail.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org; da...@davemloft.net
> Cc: Xie Shaohui-B21989
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY_RUNNING in phy_sta
From:
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:23:40 +0800
> From: Shaohui Xie
>
> Currently, if phy state is PHY_RUNNING, we always register a CHANGE
> when phy works in polling or interrupt ignored, this will make the
> adjust_link being called even the phy link did Not changed.
>
> checking the phy link t
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 2:18 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> From:
> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 12:23:40 +0800
>
> > From: Shaohui Xie
> >
> > Currently, if phy state is PHY_RUNNING, we always register a CHANGE
> > when phy works in polling or interrupt ignored, this will make the
> > adjust_link being
16 matches
Mail list logo
