On 07/31/2015 12:20 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 31-07-15, 11:04, Murali Karicheri wrote:
On 07/31/2015 04:38 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there
is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it.
IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is defined as
st
On 31-07-15, 11:04, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> On 07/31/2015 04:38 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there
> >is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it.
> >
>
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is defined as
>
> static inline bool __must_check
From: Murali Karicheri
> Sent: 31 July 2015 16:04
> On 07/31/2015 04:38 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there
> > is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it.
> >
>
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is defined as
>
> static inline bool __mus
On 07/31/2015 04:38 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there
is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it.
IS_ERR_OR_NULL() is defined as
static inline bool __must_check IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__force const void *ptr)
{
return !pt
