tdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > ker...@vger.kernel.org; de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de;
> > a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss queues
> >
> > Since you're redoing this anyway.
&g
t; a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss queues
>
> Since you're redoing this anyway.
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:21:09PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/h
Since you're redoing this anyway.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 04:21:09PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h b/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> index ddcc7f8..dd45440 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/hyperv_net.h
> @@
; jasow...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] hv_netvsc: Properly size the vrss queues
>
> From: "K. Y. Srinivasan"
> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:21:09 -0700
>
> > The current algorithm for deciding on the number of VRSS channels is
> > not optimal
From: "K. Y. Srinivasan"
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:21:09 -0700
> The current algorithm for deciding on the number of VRSS channels is
> not optimal since we open up the min of number of CPUs online and the
> number of VRSS channels the host is offering. So on a 32 VCPU guest
> we could potentiall
