From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:24:17 +0100
> Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:08:44AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>Apart from the usability concern i have described earlier, this just seems an
>>overkill ...having to redefine every attribute.
>
> I don't hear the usability concern
On 3/15/16, 1:20 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 15/03/2016 07:30, roopa a écrit :
>> On 3/14/16, 8:00 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> Le 13/03/2016 02:56, Roopa Prabhu a écrit :
> [snip]
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
index ca764b5..2bbb
Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:08:44AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 3/15/16, 12:52 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:38:51AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>>
>[snip]
>>> how does it matter if we have reached an agreement that the struct is
>>> required ?.
>>> unlike o
Le 15/03/2016 07:30, roopa a écrit :
On 3/14/16, 8:00 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Le 13/03/2016 02:56, Roopa Prabhu a écrit :
[snip]
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
index ca764b5..2bbb300 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/rtnetlink.h
+++ b/include/uapi
On 3/15/16, 12:52 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:38:51AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>
[snip]
>> how does it matter if we have reached an agreement that the struct is
>> required ?.
>> unlike other messages, a filter_mask is an important and must attribute for
>> stats.
Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:38:51AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 3/15/16, 12:28 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:24:22AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>> On 3/14/16, 12:04 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 07:45:23PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wro
On 3/15/16, 12:28 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:24:22AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>> On 3/14/16, 12:04 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 07:45:23PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
On 3/14/16, 7:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at
Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:24:22AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 3/14/16, 12:04 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 07:45:23PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>> On 3/14/16, 7:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 02:56:25AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrot
On 3/14/16, 12:56 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko
> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:04:35 +0100
>
>> I believe that using *any* structs to send over netlink is a mistake.
>> Netlink is capable to transfer everything using attrs. Easy to compose,
>> easy to parse. easy to extend. Couple of mor
On 3/14/16, 8:11 AM, Elad Raz wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
>> On Behalf Of Roopa Prabhu
>> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 3:56 AM
>> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: j...@mojatatu.com; da...@davemloft.net
>> Subjec
On 3/14/16, 8:00 AM, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> Le 13/03/2016 02:56, Roopa Prabhu a écrit :
>> From: Roopa Prabhu
>>
>> This patch adds a new RTM_GETSTATS message to query link stats via netlink
>> from the kernel. RTM_NEWLINK also dumps stats today, but RTM_NEWLINK
>> returns a lot more than just s
On 3/14/16, 12:04 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 07:45:23PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>> On 3/14/16, 7:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 02:56:25AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
From: Roopa Prabhu
This patch adds a new RTM_GETSTATS m
Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:56:40PM CET, da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko
>Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:04:35 +0100
>
>> I believe that using *any* structs to send over netlink is a mistake.
>> Netlink is capable to transfer everything using attrs. Easy to compose,
>> easy to parse. easy to e
From: Jiri Pirko
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 20:04:35 +0100
> I believe that using *any* structs to send over netlink is a mistake.
> Netlink is capable to transfer everything using attrs. Easy to compose,
> easy to parse. easy to extend. Couple of more bytes in the message? So what?
> For newly intro
Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 07:45:23PM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>On 3/14/16, 7:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 02:56:25AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>>> From: Roopa Prabhu
>>>
>>> This patch adds a new RTM_GETSTATS message to query link stats via netlink
>> >from
On 3/14/16, 7:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 02:56:25AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>> From: Roopa Prabhu
>>
>> This patch adds a new RTM_GETSTATS message to query link stats via netlink
> >from the kernel. RTM_NEWLINK also dumps stats today, but RTM_NEWLINK
>> returns a
> -Original Message-
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Roopa Prabhu
> Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 3:56 AM
> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: j...@mojatatu.com; da...@davemloft.net
> Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] rtnetlink: add new R
Le 13/03/2016 02:56, Roopa Prabhu a écrit :
From: Roopa Prabhu
This patch adds a new RTM_GETSTATS message to query link stats via netlink
from the kernel. RTM_NEWLINK also dumps stats today, but RTM_NEWLINK
returns a lot more than just stats and is expensive in some cases when
frequent polling
Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 02:56:25AM CET, ro...@cumulusnetworks.com wrote:
>From: Roopa Prabhu
>
>This patch adds a new RTM_GETSTATS message to query link stats via netlink
>from the kernel. RTM_NEWLINK also dumps stats today, but RTM_NEWLINK
>returns a lot more than just stats and is expensive in some
19 matches
Mail list logo
