..@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [net] tipc: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
>
>
>
> On 9/1/20 10:52 AM, Tuong Tong Lien wrote:
>
> > Ok, I've got your concern now. Actually when writing this code, I had the
> > same thought as you, but decid
From: Tuong Lien
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 02:37:55 +0700
> The 'this_cpu_ptr()' is used to obtain the AEAD key' TFM on the current
> CPU for encryption, however the execution can be preemptible since it's
> actually user-space context, so the 'using smp_processor_id() in
> preemptible' has been obs
On 8/29/20 12:37 PM, Tuong Lien wrote:
> The 'this_cpu_ptr()' is used to obtain the AEAD key' TFM on the current
> CPU for encryption, however the execution can be preemptible since it's
> actually user-space context, so the 'using smp_processor_id() in
> preemptible' has been observed.
>
> We
er.kernel.org
> Cc: tipc-discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [net] tipc: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
>
>
>
> On 8/29/20 12:37 PM, Tuong Lien wrote:
> > The 'this_cpu_ptr()' is used to obtain the AEAD key' TFM on the current
> &g
mloft.net;
>> jma...@redhat.com; ma...@donjonn.com;
>> ying@windriver.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: tipc-discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [net] tipc: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/29/20 12:37 PM, Tuong Lie
..@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [net] tipc: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
>
>
>
> On 8/31/20 1:33 AM, Tuong Tong Lien wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments, please see my answers inline.
> >
> >> -Original Message-
nn.com; ying@windriver.com;
>> netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: tipc-discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [net] tipc: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/31/20 1:33 AM, Tuong Tong Lien wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>
..@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [net] tipc: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
>
>
>
> On 8/31/20 3:05 AM, Tuong Tong Lien wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Eric Dumazet
> >> Sent: Monday, August 31, 20
nn.com; ying@windriver.com;
>> netdev@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: tipc-discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [net] tipc: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/31/20 3:05 AM, Tuong Tong Lien wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
..@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [net] tipc: fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
>
>
>
> On 9/1/20 5:18 AM, Tuong Tong Lien wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Eric Dumazet
> >> Sent: Monday, August 31, 20
On 9/1/20 10:52 AM, Tuong Tong Lien wrote:
> Ok, I've got your concern now. Actually when writing this code, I had the
> same thought as you, but decided to relax it because of the following reasons:
> 1. I don't want to use any locking methods here that can lead to competition
> (thus affect
11 matches
Mail list logo
