Re: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for null VSI

From: "Underwood, JohnX" Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:51:39 + > Sorry, folks. I was confused. The patch looked familiar, but I > wasn't able to find the email where I originally sent it out. Please stop top-posting Quote the relevant material, then add your

RE: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for null VSI

...@redhat.com; sassm...@redhat.com; jogre...@redhat.com Subject: Re: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for null VSI On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 14:41 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: "Underwood, JohnX" <johnx.underw...@intel.com> > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:15:53 + > > >

Re: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for null VSI

On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 14:41 -0500, David Miller wrote: > From: "Underwood, JohnX" > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:15:53 + > > > ACK > > You should never top-post on this mailing list. > > But in this specific case it is even more important. > > So just in case it is

Re: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for null VSI

From: "Underwood, JohnX" Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:15:53 + > ACK You should never top-post on this mailing list. But in this specific case it is even more important. So just in case it is not clear: Please, pretty please, DO NOT top-post ACKs to patches

RE: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for null VSI

ACK -Original Message- From: Kirsher, Jeffrey T Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 1:54 AM To: da...@davemloft.net Cc: Underwood, JohnX; netdev@vger.kernel.org; nhor...@redhat.com; sassm...@redhat.com; jogre...@redhat.com; Kirsher, Jeffrey T Subject: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for