On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:34 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
OK, I'm back from vacation today.
Anyway I don't have a definitive statement on this right now. I guess
I agree that I don't like having an extra parameter to a function that
should be pretty fast (although req notify isn't quite as
] [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:34 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
OK, I'm back from vacation today.
Anyway I don't have a definitive statement on this right now. I
guess
I agree that I don't like having an extra parameter to a function
that
should
OK, I'm back from vacation today.
Anyway I don't have a definitive statement on this right now. I guess
I agree that I don't like having an extra parameter to a function that
should be pretty fast (although req notify isn't quite as hot as
something like posting a send request or polling a cq),
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:34 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
OK, I'm back from vacation today.
Anyway I don't have a definitive statement on this right now. I guess
I agree that I don't like having an extra parameter to a function that
should be pretty fast (although req notify isn't quite as
So what does this tell you?
To me it looks like there's a measurable speed difference,
and so we should find a way (e.g. what I proposed) to enable chelsio
userspace
without adding overhead to other low level drivers or indeed chelsio kernel
level code.
What do you think?