Re: RFC iproute2 doc files

2017-10-02 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:31:09 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:11:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I noticed that the iproute man pages are up to date but the LaTex > > documentation > > is very out of date. Rarely updated since the Linux 2.2

Re: RFC iproute2 doc files

2017-10-02 Thread Leon Romanovsky
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:11:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > I noticed that the iproute man pages are up to date but the LaTex > documentation > is very out of date. Rarely updated since the Linux 2.2 days. > > Either someone needs to do a massive editing job on them, or they should just

Re: RFC iproute2 doc files

2017-09-29 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:18:04 +0200 Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:11:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I noticed that the iproute man pages are up to date but the LaTex > > documentation > > is very out of date. Rarely updated since the Linux

Re: RFC iproute2 doc files

2017-09-28 Thread Simon Horman
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:11:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > I noticed that the iproute man pages are up to date but the LaTex > documentation > is very out of date. Rarely updated since the Linux 2.2 days. > > Either someone needs to do a massive editing job on them, or they should just

RFC iproute2 doc files

2017-09-20 Thread Stephen Hemminger
I noticed that the iproute man pages are up to date but the LaTex documentation is very out of date. Rarely updated since the Linux 2.2 days. Either someone needs to do a massive editing job on them, or they should just be dropped. My preference would be to just drop everything in the doc/