Hi,
Thank you for the comments.
>> Why not just use sscanf?
Here's a fixed version of the previous patch, that uses sscanf.
>
> Better yet, use a better interface like netlink rather than module
> parameters.
Wouldn't that be overkill?
best regards,
---
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Takata <[EMAIL
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why not just use sscanf?
Better yet, use a better interface like netlink rather than module
parameters.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:25:52 +0900
Tetsuo Takata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I found this in drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c.
> > /* not complete check, but should be good enough to
> > catch mistakes */
>
> I made a patch which I believe is little bit better than this,
> I hope.
