Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:12:13 +0200 Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Cedric made a good point that we will have conflicts of code
>>> being added to the same place in nsproxy.c and the like. So
>>> I copied Andrew to give him a heads up.
>> here's a suggesti
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:12:13 +0200 Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cedric made a good point that we will have conflicts of code
> > being added to the same place in nsproxy.c and the like. So
> > I copied Andrew to give him a heads up.
>
> here's a suggestion,
>
> we could keep
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Eric, pick an appropriate new non-conflicting number NOW.
>
> Done. My apologies for the confusion. I thought the
> way Cedric and the IBM guys were testing someone would have
> shouted at me long before now.
>
>> This add
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:28:45 -0600
> David, Andrew thanks you both are really are good upstream
> maintainers to work with.
Just keep the coffee flowing :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > I will gladly do what I can, to help. Working against 3 trees
>> > development at the moment is a bit of a development challenge.
>>
>> Andrew has to work against
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will gladly do what I can, to help. Working against 3 trees
> > development at the moment is a bit of a development challenge.
>
> Andrew has to work against 30 or so
I wish! A remerge presently involves pul
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:00:23 -0600
> I will gladly do what I can, to help. Working against 3 trees
> development at the moment is a bit of a development challenge.
Andrew has to work against 30 or so, so multiply your pain
by 10 to understand what h
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Eric, pick an appropriate new non-conflicting number NOW.
Done. My apologies for the confusion. I thought the
way Cedric and the IBM guys were testing someone would have
shouted at me long before now.
> This adds unnecessary extra work for Andrew Mort
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:14:33 -0600
> Thanks for pointing this out, it's on my todo list to look into,
> and ensure we resolve.
>
> I'm confused because my notes have 0x8000 for the pid namespace,
> and 0x4000 for the time namespace.
Eric, pi
Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
>> index a01ac6d..e10a0a8 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>> #define CLONE_NEWUTS0x0400 /* New utsname grou
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> This patch allows you to create a new network namespace
> using sys_clone, or sys_unshare.
>
> As the network namespace is still experimental and under development
> clone and unshare support is only made available when CONFIG_NET_NS is
> selected at compile time.
>
> A
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:49:54 -0600
>
> This patch allows you to create a new network namespace
> using sys_clone, or sys_unshare.
>
> As the network namespace is still experimental and under development
> clone and unshare support is only made avail
12 matches
Mail list logo
