On 4/29/06, Santiago Leon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Ellerman wrote:
Any chance of getting it into to 2.6.17 ...
2.6.19 perhaps?
cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Michael Ellerman wrote:
Looks like this hit the floor. Any chance of getting it into to 2.6.17
Jeff? AFAICT it should still apply cleanly.
/me knocks politely
Actually, it doesn't apply cleanly anymore. Here's a patch that does.
--
Santiago A. Leon
Power Linux Development
IBM Linux
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 12:11 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 13:40 -0600, Santiago Leon wrote:
From: Michael Ellerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After a kexec the veth driver will fail when trying to register with the
Hypervisor because the previous kernel has not
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 13:40 -0600, Santiago Leon wrote:
From: Michael Ellerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After a kexec the veth driver will fail when trying to register with the
Hypervisor because the previous kernel has not unregistered.
So if the registration fails, we unregister and then try
Santiago Leon wrote:
From: Michael Ellerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After a kexec the veth driver will fail when trying to register with the
Hypervisor because the previous kernel has not unregistered.
So if the registration fails, we unregister and then try again.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:34, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:22:45 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I realise it's late, but it'd be really good if you could send this up
for 2.6.16, we're hosed without it.
I'm wondering if this means that for every virtual/hypervisor
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:10:47 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:34, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:22:45 +1100 Michael Ellerman wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I realise it's late, but it'd be really good if you could send this up
for 2.6.16, we're hosed without it.
