On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 09:44 -0700, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> Moving the EXPORT_SYMBOL definitions sounds good, but I would like to
> keep changes between EXPORT_SYMBOL and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL separate from
> this kind of cleanup. In addition, I'm not personally a huge fan of the
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL in
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:41:15AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> This puts all EXPORT_SYMBOL() macros along with the function being exported,
> and changes some exports that are only relevant to rate control modules
> and to be GPL-only because they rate control modules need to be built against
> t
