On 2017-12-18 00:53, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> Currently if kallsyms_lookup() fails to find the symbol then the address
> is printed. This potentially leaks sensitive information. Instead of
> printing the address we can return an error, giving the calling code the
> option to print the address or
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017, at 20:55, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2017-12-18 00:53, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > Currently if kallsyms_lookup() fails to find the symbol then the address
> > is printed. This potentially leaks sensitive information. Instead of
> > printing the address we can return an error,
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:41:29 +1100
"Tobin C. Harding" wrote:
> Current suggestion on list is to remove this function. Do you have a use
> case in mind where debugging will break? We could add a fix to this
> series if so. Otherwise next version will likely drop
> string_is_no_symbol()
What about
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 06:43:24PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:41:29 +1100
> "Tobin C. Harding" wrote:
>
> > Current suggestion on list is to remove this function. Do you have a use
> > case in mind where debugging will break? We could add a fix to this
> > series if so.
