Sorry for the *really* late answer, but I did not have any time to do
linux things the last weeks. :-(
On Jan 7, 2008 7:16 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:03:42 +0100
> "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2008 2:33 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[
On Monday 14 January 2008 6:04:28 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:07:46 EST, Paul Moore said:
> > http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing;a=commitdiff
> >;h=02f1c89d6e36507476f78108a3dcc78538be460b
>
> Initial testing indicates that 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 plus this
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:07:46 EST, Paul Moore said:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/?p=users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing;a=commitdiff;h=02f1c89d6e36507476f78108a3dcc78538be460b
Initial testing indicates that 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 plus this one commit is
behaving itself correctly - my Tcl test case that reliab
On Monday 14 January 2008 2:37:02 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:07:46 EST, Paul Moore said:
> > There have been quite a few changes in lblnet-2.6_testing since
> > 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 so I would recommend taking the whole tree. I'm also not
> > quite sure if
>
> Weird. I did a '
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:07:46 EST, Paul Moore said:
> There have been quite a few changes in lblnet-2.6_testing since
> 2.6.24-rc6-mm1
> so I would recommend taking the whole tree. I'm also not quite sure if
Weird. I did a 'git clone
git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing'
in
On Monday 14 January 2008 1:50:39 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:22:10 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Apparently the only new commit in there since the tree that was in
> > 24-rc6-mm1 is 5d95575903fd3865b884952bd93c339d48725c33 adding some
> > warning printk's. Would it be
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:22:10 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Apparently the only new commit in there since the tree that was in
> 24-rc6-mm1 is 5d95575903fd3865b884952bd93c339d48725c33 adding some warning
> printk's. Would it be more productive to test against the full tree, or
> leaving out the on
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:05:48 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm pulling git://git.infradead.org/users/pcmoore/lblnet-2.6_testing at the
> moment, and seeing if there's already a fix in there for this.
Apparently the only new commit in there since the tree that was in
24-rc6-mm1 is 5d95575903fd38
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:36:40 EST, Paul Moore said:
> Are you still only seeing these problems on loopback? I can't help but
> wonder
> if this is the skb_clone() problem where it wasn't copying skb->iif causing
> SELinux to silently drop the packets.
Yes, I've only spotted it on loopback. Th
On Monday 14 January 2008 11:15:38 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:35:33 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I'm seeing problems with Sendmail on 24-rc6-mm1, where the main Sendmail
> > is listening on ::1/25, and Fetchmail connects to 127.0.0.1:25 to inject
> > mail it has just f
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:35:33 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm seeing problems with Sendmail on 24-rc6-mm1, where the main Sendmail is
> listening on ::1/25, and Fetchmail connects to 127.0.0.1:25 to inject mail it
> has just fetched from an outside server via IMAP - it will often just hang and
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Any ideas?
Please provide a packet dump on both sides (or at least the sender
side).
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.or
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:04:42 +0100
Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:57:53AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> ...
> > diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..495575a
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/iommu-h
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 08:57:53AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
...
> diff --git a/lib/iommu-helper.c b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..495575a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/iommu-helper.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
> +/*
> + * IOMMU helper functions for the free area management
>
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:54:45 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > --- a/lib/iommu-helper.c~a
> > > +++ a/lib/iommu-helper.c
> > > @@ -8,15 +8,20 @@
> > > static unsigned long find_next_zero_area(unsigned long *map,
> > >unsigned long size,
> >
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:27:39 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:57:53 +0900
> FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrew, can you replace
> >
> > iommu-sg-add-iommu-helper-functions-for-the-free-area-management.patch
> >
> > with the updated patc
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:57:53 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew, can you replace
>
> iommu-sg-add-iommu-helper-functions-for-the-free-area-management.patch
>
> with the updated patch:
>
> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048997.html
>
> For your con
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:59:48 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The patches are available at:
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tomo/iommu/
> >
> > Or if you prefer the git tree:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/p
* FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patches are available at:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tomo/iommu/
>
> Or if you prefer the git tree:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tomo/linux-2.6-misc.git
> iommu-sg-fixes
btw., these improvements to
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 21:03:42 +0100
"Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 2:33 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:35:35 +0100
> > "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 6, 2008 12:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 6, 2008 2:33 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:35:35 +0100
> "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2008 12:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:41:10 +0100
> > > "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:30:48AM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
...
> I think this bug is highly timing dependent. Its not always the same
> package that dies and as this is a SMP system I would guess two CPUs
> using the same data will trigger this.
> And using the poison-option will definitily sl
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 12:35:35 +0100
"Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 12:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:41:10 +0100
> > "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I will applie your patch and see if this hunk from
> > > f
On Jan 6, 2008 12:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:41:10 +0100
> "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will applie your patch and see if this hunk from
> > find_next_zero_area() makes a difference:
> >
> >end = index + nr;
> > - if
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:41:10 +0100
"Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 4:28 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:25:24 -0800
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:10:17 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PRO
On Jan 6, 2008 4:28 AM, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:25:24 -0800
> Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:10:17 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > But the cause of my mail is the following question:
> > > Re
On Jan 6, 2008 9:27 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 03:52:32PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> ...
> > So my personal conclusion would be, that someone is writing to memory
> > that he no longer owns. Most probably 0-bytes. (the complete_routine
> > got NULLe
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 03:52:32PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
...
> So my personal conclusion would be, that someone is writing to memory
> that he no longer owns. Most probably 0-bytes. (the complete_routine
> got NULLed and the warning about dst->__refcnt being 0).
>
> Use-after-free or someth
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 17:25:24 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:10:17 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 5, 2008 3:52 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 5, 2008 11:13 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On Jan 5, 2008 11:10 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2.6.24-rc6 + mm-patches up to git.battery (includes git-net and
> git-netdev-all) worked for 110 packages, then I proclaimed it good.
> 2.6.24-rc6 + mm-patches up to (including) git.nfsd is currently
> getting testet (9 packages d
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 23:10:17 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 3:52 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 5, 2008 11:13 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:01:02AM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > > On
On Jan 5, 2008 3:52 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 11:13 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:01:02AM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > On Jan 5, 2008 1:07 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I think it wou
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 09:01:02AM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2008 1:07 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:21:26PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > On Jan 4, 2008 2:30 PM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The only thing that
On Jan 5, 2008 1:07 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:21:26PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > On Jan 4, 2008 2:30 PM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only thing that is sadly not practical is bisecting the borkenout
> > mm-patches, as tr
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 04:21:26PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 2:30 PM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> I'm open for any suggestions and will try to answer any questions.
I'm very glad, thanks!
> The only thing that is sadly not practical is bisecting the borken
On Jan 4, 2008 4:21 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2008 2:30 PM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - above git-nfsd and git-net tests should be probably repeated with
> > -rc6-mm1 git versions: so vanilla rc6 plus both these -mm patches
> > only, and if bug t
On Jan 4, 2008 2:30 PM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 04-01-2008 11:23, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > On Jan 2, 2008 10:51 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >>> Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not se
On 04-01-2008 11:23, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 10:51 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>>> Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not see any crash or warnings.
>> OK that's great. The next step would be to try
On Jan 2, 2008 10:51 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not see any crash or warnings.
>
> OK that's great. The next step would be to try excluding specific git
> trees from mm t
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:37:46PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2008 10:57 PM, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:51:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > The two specific trees of interest would be git-nfsd and git-net.
> >
> > Also, if it's git-nfs
On Jan 2, 2008 10:57 PM, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:51:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > The two specific trees of interest would be git-nfsd and git-net.
>
> Also, if it's git-nfsd, it'd be useful to test with the current git-nfsd
> from the for-mm bran
On Jan 2, 2008 10:57 PM, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:51:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > >
> > > Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not see any crash or warnings.
> >
> > OK that's g
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 08:51:54AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not see any crash or warnings.
>
> OK that's great. The next step would be to try excluding specific git
> trees from mm to
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>
> Vanilla 2.6.24-rc6 seems stable. I did not see any crash or warnings.
OK that's great. The next step would be to try excluding specific git
trees from mm to see if they make a difference.
The two specific trees of interest would
On Jan 1, 2008 1:04 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In any case, I suspect the cause of your problem is that somebody
> somewhere is doing a double-free on an skb.
>
> Since you're the only person who can reproduce this, we really need
> your help to track this down. Since bisecting th
On Jan 1, 2008 1:59 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 1:04 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:15:19PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > >
> > > I then tried to "fix" it with this suspect.
> > > I changed "skb_release_all(dst);" back
On Jan 1, 2008 1:04 PM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:15:19PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > I then tried to "fix" it with this suspect.
> > I changed "skb_release_all(dst);" back to "skb_release_data(dst);" in
> > skb_morph() (net/core/skbuff.c).
>
> Chec
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 09:15:19PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>
> I then tried to "fix" it with this suspect.
> I changed "skb_release_all(dst);" back to "skb_release_data(dst);" in
> skb_morph() (net/core/skbuff.c).
Check /proc/net/snmp to see if you're getting any fragments, if not
then skb_m
On Monday 31 December 2007 4:46:09 pm James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Paul Moore wrote:
> > I'm pretty certain this is an uninitialized value problem now and not a
> > use-after-free issue. The invalid/garbage ->iif value seems to only
> > happen on packets that are generated locally an
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Paul Moore wrote:
> I'm pretty certain this is an uninitialized value problem now and not a
> use-after-free issue. The invalid/garbage ->iif value seems to only happen
> on packets that are generated locally and sent back into the stack for local
> consumption, e.g. loopb
On Dec 30, 2007 4:34 AM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2007 2:30 AM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:51:13PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > >
> > > > > The cause, why I am resending this: I just got a crash with
> > > > > 2.6.24-rc6-mm
On Monday 31 December 2007 12:13:32 pm Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 December 2007 4:52:03 pm James Morris wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2007, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > As James said I'm away right now and computer access is limited.
> > > However, I'm stuck in the airport right now and spent some
On Dec 30, 2007 10:35 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2007 10:24 PM, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Tom Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:07:17 -0600
> >
> > Bruce/Aime:
> >
> > Here is what I believe to be the fix for the
On Dec 30, 2007 10:24 PM, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:07:46PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:53:49 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Dec 23, 2007 5:27 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:07:46PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:53:49 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 23, 2007 5:27 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Dec 23, 2007 8:30 AM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
>
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:34:36 +0100 Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2007 2:30 AM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:51:13PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > >
> > > > > The cause, why I am resending this: I just got a crash with
> > > > > 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, again
On Dec 30, 2007 2:30 AM, Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:51:13PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > > > The cause, why I am resending this: I just got a crash with
> > > > 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, again looking network related:
> > > >
> > > > [93436.933356] WARNING: at
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 05:51:13PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>
> > > The cause, why I am resending this: I just got a crash with
> > > 2.6.24-rc6-mm1, again looking network related:
> > >
> > > [93436.933356] WARNING: at include/net/dst.h:165 dst_release()
> > > [93436.936685] Pid: 8079, comm: k
On Dec 29, 2007 12:07 AM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:53:49 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 23, 2007 5:27 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > [ 7620.708561] Pid: 5698, comm: nfsv4-svc Not tainted 2.6.24-rc3-mm2
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:53:49 +0100 "Torsten Kaiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 23, 2007 5:27 PM, Torsten Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 23, 2007 8:30 AM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24
60 matches
Mail list logo
