On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:56:28 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 23:30:50 -0700
> > Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:36:52AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > [.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 01:30:25PM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 23:30:50 -0700
> Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:36:52AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> [...]
> > > Imagine you have packets intermixed towards the stack and XDP_TX.
>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:56:55AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 23:30:50 -0700
> Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:36:52AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > > > Lets do bundling/bulking from the start!
> > > >
> > > > mlx4 alrea
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 23:30:50 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:36:52AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
[...]
> > Imagine you have packets intermixed towards the stack and XDP_TX.
> > Every time you call the stack code, then you flush your icache. When
> > returnin
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 23:30:50 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:36:52AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > > Lets do bundling/bulking from the start!
> > >
> > > mlx4 already does bulking and this proposed mlx5 set of patches
> > > does bulking as well.
> >
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:22:04 -0700
> Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:11:47AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm sorry but I have a problem with this patch!
>>
>> is it because the variable is
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 07:36:52AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > Lets do bundling/bulking from the start!
> >
> > mlx4 already does bulking and this proposed mlx5 set of patches
> > does bulking as well.
> > See nothing wrong about it. RX side processes the packets and
> > when it'
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:22:04 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:11:47AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry but I have a problem with this patch!
>
> is it because the variable is called 'xdp_doorbell'?
> Frankly I see nothing scary in this patch.
>
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:11:47AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> I'm sorry but I have a problem with this patch!
is it because the variable is called 'xdp_doorbell'?
Frankly I see nothing scary in this patch.
It extends existing code by adding a flag to ring doorbell or not.
The end of
