On Dec 14, 2007 11:09 PM, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5, or something odd
when I did a make oldconfig, I
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 00:16 -0800, Ray Lee wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 11:09 PM, Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5,
On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
(-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know.
I'll check current tip on the weekend when
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
(-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know.
I'll check current
On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
(-rc5) doesn't show any
tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
(-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know.
I'll check current tip on the weekend when I'll have the luxury to
have my main system down long
